Welcome

  • Naked Law is written by technology lawyers from Mills & Reeve. Our team is (mostly) based in Cambridge, England. We write about the latest legal and regulatory developments relating to information and communication technology, e-commerce, and privacy.

    Please send us an email or post a comment if you want to join in the discussions on Naked Law.

Disclaimer

  • The information on this blog is not legal advice. You should not rely on it and we don't accept liability in connection with it. Please read our full disclaimer and let us know if you would like us to advise on any legal issue.

« ICO issues first penalties for data protection breaches | Main | Advertising broadband speeds – Ofcom has its say »

Comments

Peter

The stuff about the "fair use" exemption made me think of the Gowers Review, which included quite a lot of stuff about fair use/fair dealing. Have a look at paragraphs 4.68 to 4.90 here:

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/pbr06_gowers_report_755.pdf

Google were whinging about this then:

'Google explain in their response to the Call for Evidence: “The existence of a general fair use exception that can adapt to new technical environments may explain why the search engines first developed in the USA, where users were able to rely on flexible copyright exceptions, and not in the UK, where such uses would have been considered infringement”.'

I wonder what another review will find ...

Emil A. Georgiev

We all should welcome Cameron's approach and support it in order to achieve a new regulation on European level.

The comments to this entry are closed.